J&K History Series Navigation

Learning Dashboard

Introduction

The history of ancient Kashmir cannot be reconstructed from a single continuous contemporary historical record. Unlike a modern state archive, the surviving evidence is scattered across literary works, archaeological remains, inscriptions, coins, manuscripts, religious traditions and the observations of travellers who visited the region at different times. Each source illuminates a different part of the past, but each also has limitations. The historian’s task is therefore not simply to collect facts from every source, but to compare different kinds of evidence and determine what each source can legitimately establish.

This makes Kashmir particularly important for the study of historical methodology. Kalhana’s Rajatarangini, composed in the 12th century, provides an extensive narrative of Kashmir’s rulers, places and political traditions, while archaeology supplies material evidence that can confirm, modify or sometimes complicate literary accounts. Inscriptions can provide direct evidence for names, titles, religious patronage, institutions and chronology; coins can illuminate political authority, economic circulation and cultural connections; and travel accounts provide external observations of Kashmir at particular moments.

The central principle of this article is therefore: Ancient Kashmir must be reconstructed by connecting sources, not by treating one source as universally authoritative.

This distinction is especially important for competitive examinations. A question may ask not merely what happened, but which source tells us about it, how reliable that source is, whether the evidence is contemporary, and whether a statement represents established evidence or later tradition.

CivilsCentral Historical Insight
The history of ancient Kashmir is best understood as an exercise in source comparison. Rajatarangini gives Kashmir an unusually rich historical narrative, but archaeology, inscriptions, coins and travel accounts provide independent or complementary evidence that allows historians to test, refine and contextualise that narrative.

Part I — Why Sources Matter in Ancient Kashmir

1. The Problem of Reconstructing the Ancient Past

Historical reconstruction depends on surviving evidence, and survival is uneven. Buildings may have disappeared, inscriptions may have been damaged, manuscripts may survive only in later copies, and oral traditions may have changed over generations. Kashmir’s geography has also shaped the archaeological record: settlements have been repeatedly occupied, structures reused, altered or destroyed, while political centres shifted over time.

The result is an uneven historical record. Some periods have comparatively strong archaeological evidence, while others depend more heavily on literary traditions. The Kushan period, for example, can be studied through archaeological sites, coins and literary references, whereas much earlier political traditions recorded by Kalhana require greater caution because the chronicle was composed many centuries later.

The historian must therefore distinguish between: Evidence that directly survives from a period and a later source describing that earlier period.

That distinction is fundamental to the entire study of Kashmir’s ancient history.

2. Different Sources Answer Different Questions

No single source type is capable of answering every historical question.

The same event may therefore appear differently in different sources. A ruler’s literary biography may emphasise his religious patronage, while archaeology may reveal the actual distribution of monuments attributed to his period. A travel account may record the number of monasteries in a particular century, but it cannot automatically tell us how many existed two centuries earlier.

Part II — Literary Sources of Ancient Kashmir

3. Nilamata Purana: Sacred Geography and Cultural Memory

The Nilamata Purana is an important Sanskrit text for understanding the cultural and sacred geography of Kashmir. It contains descriptions of the Valley’s landscape, sacred places, festivals, rituals, rivers, lakes and religious practices.

Its significance is different from that of Rajatarangini. The Nilamata Purana is not a dynastic chronicle arranged around a continuous sequence of kings. Instead, it provides a cultural and religious representation of Kashmir and helps historians understand how the Valley’s landscape was conceptualised within Sanskritic traditions.

Modern scholarship commonly places the text broadly in the early medieval period, although questions of dating and textual development remain. Cambridge scholarship notes that the Nilamata Purana belongs to the seventh-century textual tradition, while Rajatarangini belongs to the twelfth century.

Historical Value

The Nilamata Purana is particularly useful for:

• sacred geography
• religious practices
• festivals
• local traditions
• rivers and sacred sites
• cultural conceptions of Kashmir.

Limitation

It should not be treated as a contemporary political chronicle of the earliest history of Kashmir.

4. Buddhist Literary Traditions

Buddhist texts and traditions preserve important information concerning the early history of Buddhism in Kashmir. These include traditions associated with Ashoka, Madhyantika, Kanishka and the Sarvāstivāda school.

Their importance is particularly clear when combined with archaeology. Harwan, Ushkur and other Buddhist sites provide material evidence for Buddhist institutional life, while Buddhist literary traditions provide explanations of how Buddhist communities understood their own history.

However, Buddhist traditions often contain religious narratives and retrospective accounts. They should therefore be classified according to their evidentiary strength rather than treated automatically as contemporary historical documentation.

Part III — Kalhana’s Rajatarangini

5. What Is the Rajatarangini?

Kalhana’s Rajatarangini, literally the “River of Kings,” is the most important indigenous historical chronicle of Kashmir.

It was composed in Sanskrit in the 12th century, generally dated to around 1148–1150 CE. The work is written in verse and is divided into eight tarangas or cantos, containing thousands of verses. University of Kashmir scholarship describes it as the earliest extant historical chronicle of Kashmir and notes that it narrates the history of Kashmir from its legendary beginnings to Kalhana’s own time.

Its importance is enormous, but its nature must be understood correctly. Rajatarangini is a historical chronicle, not a modern archival history.

Kalhana combines political narrative, genealogy, literary description, moral interpretation, geographical information and traditions from earlier sources. The work therefore has to be critically analysed rather than read as though every statement has the same evidentiary status.

6. Why Rajatarangini Is So Important

The importance of Rajatarangini lies partly in its chronological ambition. Kalhana attempted to narrate Kashmir’s political history across a very long period. He was interested in rulers, succession, political conflict, cities, temples, land, taxation, administrative practices and the consequences of royal behaviour.

The chronicle is particularly valuable for the history of medieval Kashmir because the narrative becomes progressively richer as it approaches Kalhana’s own period. It provides detailed information about political events, rulers and social conditions that cannot be reconstructed from archaeology alone.

Modern scholarship also emphasises that Kalhana drew upon earlier chronicles and other materials rather than creating his narrative entirely from imagination. University of Kashmir research identifies earlier chronicles associated with figures such as Suvrata, Padmamihira and Chavillakara among the materials connected with Kalhana’s historical reconstruction.

7. Kalhana’s Historical Method

One reason Rajatarangini is historically valuable is that Kalhana displays an interest in evidence and chronology. He did not simply present kings as isolated figures. He attempted to connect rulers, dynasties, political changes and consequences. His narrative also includes references to earlier historical traditions, inscriptions, monuments, genealogical material and other sources.

However, Kalhana’s method was not identical to modern historical criticism. He wrote in a Sanskrit poetic tradition, incorporated legends and religious traditions, and sometimes assigned great antiquity to events for which independent evidence is unavailable.

Therefore, the correct approach is: Use Kalhana seriously — but critically.

CivilsCentral Historical Insight
Kalhana’s importance does not come from the assumption that everything in Rajatarangini is literally correct. It comes from the extraordinary historical information contained in the chronicle and from the possibility of testing portions of its narrative against archaeology, inscriptions, coins and other sources.

Part IV — The Eight Tarangas and the Changing Reliability of the Narrative

8. The Broad Structure

The eight tarangas create a continuous narrative of Kashmir’s kings. The early portions contain extensive legendary and traditional material, while the later sections provide increasingly detailed political information. This does not mean that the early books are historically worthless. Rather, their information must be treated differently because independent contemporary evidence is much thinner.

A useful examination-oriented distinction is:

Early Rajatarangini → greater dependence on tradition

Later Rajatarangini → progressively richer historical detail

This is a matter of evidentiary density, not a claim that one section is simply “true” and another “false.”

9. Legendary Beginnings and Historical Caution

Kalhana begins Kashmir’s history with traditions concerning the ancient landscape and early rulers. These include the famous narrative of Kashmir having once been a lake and the role of Kashyapa in making the land habitable. The story is historically important as a cultural tradition and as part of Kashmir’s sacred geography. It should not, however, be used as literal geological evidence.

Modern geology can independently establish the Valley’s history as a former lake basin in broad geological terms, but that does not prove the historical truth of the specific Kashyapa narrative.

This distinction illustrates a recurring principle in J&K history: A traditional narrative may preserve a cultural memory without being a literal historical record.

Part V — Archaeology: The Material Record of Kashmir

10. What Archaeology Adds

Archaeology provides evidence that does not depend on the narrative of a particular historian.

Excavations and surveys can reveal:

• settlement patterns
• houses
• fortifications
• religious buildings
• monasteries
• stupas
• pottery
• tools
• sculptures
• terracotta objects
• coins
• industrial activity
• trade connections.

11. Semthan: Archaeology and the Early Historic Transition

Semthan is one of the most important early historic archaeological sites in Kashmir.

Excavations have yielded evidence associated with Northern Black Polished Ware, Indo-Greek material and Kushan remains, demonstrating that the site participated in the changing political and economic landscape of early historic Kashmir. University of Kashmir research describes Semthan as an important early historic urban centre and examines its links with Central Asian regions.

The significance of Semthan is methodological as well as archaeological. It allows historians to reconstruct periods in which literary narratives may be incomplete. Material evidence can establish that communities, technologies and political connections existed even where a textual chronicle provides limited information.

12. Harwan

Harwan is particularly important for the study of Buddhist Kashmir. Its archaeological remains include a substantial Buddhist complex and distinctive decorated terracotta tiles. The site demonstrates the existence of Buddhist institutional life and connections with wider north-western artistic traditions.

Harwan is therefore an excellent example of how archaeology can independently illuminate religious history. At the same time, the site illustrates the importance of chronological caution. Its archaeological phases should not automatically be equated with every literary event traditionally associated with the area.

13. Ushkur

Ushkur, near Baramulla, provides another important archaeological window into ancient Kashmir.

The site is traditionally associated with Hushkapura, linked with the Kushan ruler Huvishka. Archaeological evidence and literary tradition together make the site important for understanding Kushan-period Kashmir and the western gateway of the Valley.

The Baramulla region itself was strategically significant because the Jhelum provided an important route linking the Valley with areas to the west. University of Kashmir research emphasises the dense concentration of archaeological remains around the Jhelum basin and the region’s role in connecting Kashmir with the outside world.

14. Parihaspora

Parihaspora is associated with the Karkota ruler Lalitaditya Muktapida and represents another important example of archaeology and literary history intersecting.

Kalhana provides a detailed account of royal foundations and monumental construction associated with the Karkota period. Archaeological remains at Parihaspora allow historians to investigate the physical landscape behind this literary narrative.

The significance of the site therefore lies not simply in its monuments but in the opportunity to compare what Kalhana says with what the archaeological landscape reveals.

CivilsCentral Historical Insight
Archaeology does not merely “confirm” literary history. It can also modify it. When a settlement mentioned by Kalhana is excavated, historians can compare literary claims concerning its location, scale and function with the physical evidence actually preserved beneath and around the site.

Part VI — Inscriptions: Direct Historical Evidence

15. What Is an Inscription?

An inscription is a written record preserved on a durable surface such as:

• stone
• metal
• terracotta
• seals
• architectural elements
• other objects.

Epigraphy—the study of inscriptions—is especially valuable because inscriptions can provide contemporary or near-contemporary evidence.

They may contain:

• ruler’s name
• royal title
• date
• genealogy
• religious affiliation
• land grant
• donation
• construction activity
• administrative information
• names of places or individuals.

For ancient history, such evidence can be more direct than a much later literary narrative.

16. Brahmi and Kharoshthi

Two major ancient scripts are particularly important in the broader north-western historical context:

Brahmi and Kharoshthi.

Brahmi was generally written from left to right, while Kharoshthi was written from right to left and was particularly associated with the north-west. Archaeological and epigraphic scholarship identifies both among the earliest decipherable writing systems of ancient India.

Kharoshthi is especially relevant to the study of ancient Kashmir because the Valley’s western and north-western connections brought it into contact with Gandharan and Central Asian cultural zones. Kharoshthi numerals and inscriptions found in Buddhist archaeological contexts such as Harwan are consequently significant evidence of these wider connections.

17. Sharada and the Later Epigraphic Landscape

The Sharada script became particularly associated with Kashmir and the north-western Himalayan region in the later historical period.

The Indira Gandhi National Centre for the Arts notes that Sharada was widely used across Kashmir and adjoining regions including parts of Afghanistan/Gandhara, Gilgit, Chilas, Chitral, Ladakh, Jammu, Himachal Pradesh and Delhi. Epigraphic and literary records in Sharada therefore provide important evidence for the history and culture of Kashmir and the wider north-west.

For examination purposes, however, an important chronological distinction should be maintained: Kharoshthi/Brahmi → ancient north-western epigraphic context

Sharada → later Kashmir-associated script tradition. They should not be treated as interchangeable.

18. What Inscriptions Can and Cannot Do

Inscriptions are extremely valuable, but they do not automatically provide a complete political narrative. A royal inscription may tell us that a ruler constructed or donated something. It may provide a date or title. It may identify a religious institution. But it may not explain the broader political circumstances surrounding the event.

Similarly, the absence of an inscription does not prove that an event did not happen. This is particularly important in the study of ancient Kashmir, where the surviving epigraphic record is uneven.

Therefore: Inscription = direct evidence for what it records, not

Inscription = complete history of the period.

Part VII — Coins as Historical Sources

19. Why Coins Matter

Coins are another major form of material evidence. They can provide information about:

• rulers
• royal titles
• political symbols
• religious imagery
• economic circulation
• trade
• chronology
• cultural interaction.

Coins are particularly valuable in periods where written political records are limited.

20. Kushan Coins and Kashmir

Kushan coins are especially important for reconstructing the Kushan presence in Kashmir. Archaeological research has documented numerous Kushan-period sites and coin finds in the Valley, providing material evidence that complements literary references to Kanishka, Huvishka and other Kushan rulers.

Coins also help illuminate the religious and cultural environment of the Kushan world. Their imagery includes a variety of deities, demonstrating that the political environment was religiously plural rather than reducible to a single religious identity.

This makes numismatics particularly useful when testing literary descriptions of royal religious policy.

21. Coins and Chronology

Coins can sometimes help establish the chronological presence of a ruler or political authority at a particular location. However, a coin found at a site does not necessarily prove that the ruler personally visited or administered the site. Coins can move through trade, taxation, military activity or exchange.

Therefore:

Coin found at a site → evidence of circulation or presence

does not automatically mean:

Coin found at a site → direct proof of political administration.

This distinction is a useful example of evidence-based reasoning for JKSSB.

Part VIII — Travel Accounts: Kashmir Seen by Outsiders

22. Why Travel Accounts Are Valuable

Travel accounts provide an external perspective on Kashmir. Unlike a royal inscription or local chronicle, a traveller may describe what he personally observed:

• cities
• monasteries
• temples
• routes
• rulers
• religious communities
• customs
• geography
• educational institutions.

But travellers also had purposes and limitations. Buddhist pilgrims naturally paid particular attention to monasteries and religious teachers, while their numerical estimates may not meet modern standards of demographic measurement.

Part IX — Xuanzang

23. Xuanzang’s Visit to Kashmir

The Chinese Buddhist monk Xuanzang visited Kashmir in the 7th century CE and spent an extended period studying there.

His account is particularly important because it describes Kashmir as a significant centre of Buddhist learning. He studied Buddhist doctrine and Sanskrit with learned teachers, demonstrating that the Valley was not simply a pilgrimage destination but also an intellectual centre.

His account is therefore valuable for the history of:

• Buddhist monasteries
• Buddhist teachers
• Sanskrit learning
• routes
• political geography
• religious institutions.

24. Xuanzang’s Numerical Information

Xuanzang’s account is often used for estimates of the number of monasteries and monks in Kashmir. Such figures are important historical evidence, but they should be presented as reported observations or estimates, not as modern census data.

This distinction matters because travellers could count institutions differently, could rely on local informants, and could focus on particular religious networks. The value of the figures therefore lies primarily in demonstrating the scale and visibility of Buddhist institutional life, rather than in providing a statistically precise population count.

CivilsCentral Historical Insight
Xuanzang is valuable not because every numerical detail in his account can be treated as statistically exact, but because his prolonged stay provides external evidence that Kashmir possessed a substantial Buddhist intellectual and institutional environment in the 7th century.

Part X — O-kong and the 8th-Century Record

25. O-kong / Wukong

The Chinese Buddhist pilgrim O-kong, also known as Wukong, provides another important external perspective on Kashmir.

He reached Kashmir in the 8th century CE and studied Buddhist texts and Sanskrit. His account is particularly useful because it extends the documentary evidence for Buddhist learning beyond Xuanzang’s time.

His presence demonstrates that Kashmir’s reputation as a Buddhist intellectual centre did not disappear immediately after the 7th century.

26. Why Multiple Travel Accounts Matter

When two travellers separated by roughly a century describe Kashmir as a place of Buddhist learning, the evidence becomes stronger for the continuity of Buddhist institutions across that period.

Nevertheless, their accounts must still be interpreted in context. They were Buddhist pilgrims, so their interests naturally concentrated on Buddhist institutions. Their accounts therefore should not be used to infer that Kashmir’s entire population was Buddhist.

This distinction is essential: Evidence of Buddhist institutional strength ≠ evidence of complete religious uniformity.

Part XI — Other External and Regional Sources

27. Classical and North-Western Connections

Kashmir’s history was closely connected with the wider north-western region. Greek, Roman and later Central Asian geographical traditions sometimes preserve information about peoples and regions surrounding Kashmir. Such evidence is useful for reconstructing Kashmir’s external connections, but geographic identifications must be made cautiously.

Ancient geographical names do not always correspond exactly to modern political boundaries. Terms such as Gandhara, Darada, Kamboja and other regional names changed in meaning and geographical scope across time.

Therefore, ancient geographical references should not be mechanically mapped onto modern J&K districts.

28. Persian Sources

Persian historical writing becomes increasingly important for Kashmir’s later medieval history. However, it should not be projected backward into periods for which it does not provide contemporary evidence. For the ancient period, Sanskrit literary sources, archaeology, inscriptions, coins and Chinese accounts are generally more central.

This distinction becomes increasingly important in later articles dealing with the Sultanate, Mughal, Afghan and Sikh periods.

Part XII — Archaeology and Literary History: Testing the Narrative

29. When Archaeology Supports Literary Tradition

A particularly valuable situation occurs when a site described in literary sources can be independently identified archaeologically.

For example, literary traditions concerning Kushan settlements can be examined alongside archaeological remains and coins. University of Kashmir research notes that literary references to Kushan rulers and settlements in Kashmir have been complemented by archaeological and numismatic evidence.

This does not mean that every literary detail has been proven. Rather, the convergence of different evidence types increases confidence in the broader historical interpretation.

30. When Archaeology Complicates Literary Tradition

Archaeology can also challenge overly simple readings of texts. A literary source may attribute the foundation of a settlement to a particular ruler, while archaeology may reveal that occupation began earlier and continued long afterward. In such a case, the ruler may have expanded, renamed, rebuilt or patronised an existing settlement rather than created it entirely from nothing.

This is why archaeological chronology is essential when interpreting foundation traditions.

The historian should therefore ask: Was the ruler the first occupant?

or

Did the ruler transform an already existing settlement?

The two claims are not equivalent.

Part XIII — The Archaeological Landscape and Rajatarangini

31. Kalhana’s Places on the Ground

One of the most productive areas of current Kashmir historical research is the comparison between places mentioned in Rajatarangini and archaeological remains.

University of Kashmir research specifically examines settlements and religious structures mentioned by Kalhana and compares their literary descriptions with the archaeological landscape of Kashmir. Many such settlements survive today primarily as ruins or archaeological traces.

This approach transforms Rajatarangini from a text that is simply read into a source that can be tested spatially and materially.

32. The Jhelum Basin as a Historical Landscape

The Jhelum basin is especially important because the river connected settlements within Kashmir and linked the Valley toward the west. Research on the Baramulla archaeological landscape shows that numerous settlements and structures were concentrated around the Jhelum basin and that routes through this region connected Kashmir with the outside world.

This geographical evidence helps explain why so many historical sites emerged along river corridors. The historical map of Kashmir was therefore shaped not merely by political boundaries but also by:

rivers + passes + settlement zones + trade routes + religious centres.

Part XIV — Manuscripts and Palaeography

33. Manuscripts as Historical Sources

Manuscripts preserve texts, but they must be distinguished from the original date of composition. A manuscript copy may be centuries later than the work it contains. Therefore:

date of manuscript ≠ date of text.

This is especially important in Kashmir, where many Sanskrit works survive through manuscript traditions that were copied and recopied over long periods.

The study of manuscripts therefore requires:

• palaeography
• textual criticism
• comparison of manuscripts
• linguistic analysis
• identification of interpolations and later additions.

34. Birch Bark and Kashmir’s Manuscript Tradition

Kashmir’s natural and cultural environment supported the historical use of birch bark as a writing material.

The broader Indian manuscript tradition included birch bark, palm leaf and later paper. IGNCA notes that manuscripts were historically written on materials including birch bark and that palaeography is essential for studying the development of scripts and manuscripts.

The survival of manuscripts provides evidence not only for political history but also for:

• philosophy
• grammar
• medicine
• astronomy
• literature
• mathematics
• religious thought.

Thus manuscript history broadens our understanding of Kashmir beyond dynasties and battles.

Part XV — Sharada and the Intellectual History of Kashmir

35. Sharada as a Historical Source

The development and use of the Sharada script are important for understanding Kashmir’s later intellectual and cultural history.

Sharada became strongly associated with Kashmir and was used across a much wider north-western region. The script appears in inscriptions and manuscripts and therefore connects palaeography with the history of language, literature and education.

Its geographical spread also reminds us that ancient and medieval Kashmir should not be studied as an isolated valley. Written culture connected Kashmir with Jammu, Ladakh and north-western regions.

Part XVI — Source Criticism: How Historians Read the Evidence

36. Source A — Contemporary vs Later

The first question is: How close is the source to the event?

A contemporary inscription generally has a different evidentiary position from a 12th-century text describing an event supposedly occurring many centuries earlier. But chronological proximity alone does not guarantee truth. Contemporary royal inscriptions can exaggerate victories or glorify rulers.

Therefore: Contemporary ≠ automatically unbiased.

37. Source B — Purpose

Every source has a purpose. A royal inscription may legitimise a ruler. A Buddhist pilgrim may focus on monasteries. A religious text may preserve sacred traditions. A chronicle may interpret political events through moral categories. A coin may serve economic and political purposes.

Understanding the purpose of a source helps historians identify what it is most useful for.

38. Source C — Corroboration

The strongest historical reconstruction often emerges when independent sources converge.

For example:

Literary reference

archaeological remains

coins

inscriptions

can produce a much stronger reconstruction than any one source alone.

This is the principle of corroboration.

39. Source D — Contradiction

Contradictions between sources should not simply be erased. If a literary source gives one date and archaeological evidence suggests another, the disagreement becomes part of the historical problem.

The correct approach is:

1. identify the disagreement;
2. assess the evidence;
3. explain the stronger interpretation;
4. retain uncertainty where it remains.

This is especially important for disputed chronologies and identifications in ancient Kashmir.

CivilsCentral Historical Insight
Historical evidence becomes powerful through comparison. The historian does not ask only, “What does this source say?” but also, “When was it produced, why was it produced, what could its author have known, and does another independent source support it?”

Part XVII — Evidence Hierarchy for Ancient Kashmir

40. Level A — Strongly Established Evidence

Examples include:

• archaeological remains physically excavated or documented;
• coins recovered from archaeological contexts;
• inscriptions whose text and provenance are established;
• documented visits by historical travellers;
• securely dated material evidence.

These sources can support strong historical statements, although their interpretation still requires care.

41. Level B — Strong Historical Tradition

This category includes historical traditions that are widely used in reconstructing Kashmir’s past but are not supported equally by contemporary evidence.

Examples may include:

• traditional associations between particular rulers and settlements;
• literary traditions concerning certain political developments;
• established historical interpretations based on several sources.

42. Level C — Traditional or Literary Account

This includes narratives primarily preserved through literary or religious traditions.

Examples include:

• certain early dynastic traditions;
• sacred narratives concerning Kashmir’s creation;
• missionary legends;
• some accounts of ancient rulers.

These are historically valuable as traditions but should not automatically be converted into established fact.

43. Level D — Contested Interpretation

This category includes questions where scholars continue to disagree about:

• exact chronology
• identification of places
• political control
• foundation traditions
• interpretation of archaeological layers
• historical details of literary narratives.

A premium historical article should explicitly identify such uncertainty rather than conceal it.

Part XVIII — The Source Matrix

Part XIX — What Each Major Source Is Best Used For

Rajatarangini

Best for: Kashmir’s political narrative, rulers, dynasties, places and medieval historical memory.

Archaeology

Best for: settlements, architecture, material culture, chronology and physical evidence.

Inscriptions

Best for: names, titles, dates, donations, construction and institutional information.

Coins

Best for: rulers, political symbols, circulation, economic networks and cultural imagery.

Nilamata Purana

Best for: sacred geography, religious practices and cultural traditions.

Xuanzang

Best for: 7th-century Buddhist institutions, learning, routes and external observation.

O-kong

Best for: 8th-century Buddhist learning and institutional continuity.

Manuscripts

Best for: intellectual, literary, scientific and religious history.

Part XX — Historical Significance

44. Why Kashmir Has an Unusually Rich Historical Tradition

Kashmir’s historical tradition is distinctive because several different source traditions overlap. There is a strong Sanskrit literary tradition, an extensive archaeological landscape, a record of Buddhist connections, manuscript traditions and accounts from foreign travellers. The interaction between these sources allows historians to reconstruct aspects of Kashmir’s past that would otherwise remain obscure.

This does not mean that Kashmir possesses a complete historical record. Rather, it means that the potential for source comparison is unusually rich.

45. The Importance of Rajatarangini Without Romanticising It

Rajatarangini should neither be dismissed as mythology nor treated as a modern history book.

Its importance lies between these extremes. It preserves historical traditions, political information, geographical descriptions and narratives of rulers that are indispensable to the study of Kashmir. At the same time, it incorporates poetic conventions, legends and information from periods far removed from Kalhana’s own lifetime.

The mature historical approach is therefore:

Respect the source → interrogate the source → compare the source → contextualise the source.

46. Archaeology as an Independent Check

Archaeology provides a particularly important check because material remains were not created to satisfy later historians. A ruined settlement, coin, stupa, inscription or pottery assemblage can reveal aspects of the past that a literary source omitted or interpreted differently.

This makes archaeological research essential for testing claims about:

• settlement chronology
• urban development
• religious institutions
• trade
• political connectivity
• cultural interaction.

47. Travel Accounts as External Evidence

Travel accounts are valuable because they provide an outsider’s perspective. Xuanzang and O-kong demonstrate that Kashmir was connected to wider Buddhist intellectual networks. Their accounts help historians understand how Kashmir appeared to visitors at particular moments.

But external observation also has limitations. A traveller’s Kashmir is partly shaped by the purpose of the journey and the interests of the traveller. Therefore, travel accounts are strongest when combined with local and archaeological evidence.

Part XXI — JKSSB Knowledge Matrix

Part XXII — Examination Discrimination Points

1. Rajatarangini vs Nilamata Purana

Rajatarangini → Kalhana → 12th century → historical chronicle.

Nilamata Purana → earlier Sanskrit cultural/religious tradition → sacred geography and ritual culture.

2. Archaeology vs Epigraphy

Archaeology studies the material remains of past societies.

Epigraphy specifically studies inscriptions.

An inscription may itself be an archaeological object, but the disciplines are not identical.

3. Epigraphy vs Numismatics

Epigraphy → inscriptions

Numismatics → coins

4. Brahmi vs Kharoshthi

Brahmi → generally left to right

Kharoshthi → right to left; strong north-western association

5. Kharoshthi vs Sharada

Kharoshthi → ancient north-western script tradition

Sharada → later Kashmir-associated script tradition

6. Kalhana vs Xuanzang

Kalhana → local Sanskrit chronicler, 12th century

Xuanzang → Chinese Buddhist pilgrim, 7th century

7. Xuanzang vs O-kong

Xuanzang → 7th century

O-kong → 8th century

8. Literary Evidence vs Archaeological Evidence

A literary text may describe an event. Archaeology can demonstrate physical remains. The strongest reconstruction often comes when both converge.

Part XXIII — JKSSB Question Pattern

Direct Fact

Who wrote Rajatarangini?

Answer: Kalhana

Statement-Based

Consider the following statements:

1. Rajatarangini was composed in Sanskrit.
2. It is divided into eight tarangas.
3. It was written during the Mauryan period.

Correct: 1 and 2 only.

Match the Following

Identification by Clues

Identify the source:

• Sanskrit
• 12th century
• Kashmir
• eight tarangas
• kings of Kashmir

Answer: Rajatarangini

Conceptual-Factual

Which source is most directly useful for studying physical settlement remains?

A. Archaeology
B. Royal genealogy
C. Religious legend
D. Oral tradition

Answer: A. Archaeology

Part XXIV — JKSSB Practice Questions

Question 1

Who composed Rajatarangini?

A. Bilhana
B. Kalhana
C. Somadeva
D. Kshemendra

Correct Answer: B. Kalhana

Explanation: Kalhana composed the Sanskrit chronicle Rajatarangini in the 12th century.

Question 2

Consider the following statements about Rajatarangini:

1. It is written in Sanskrit.
2. It is divided into eight tarangas.
3. It was composed during the reign of Kanishka.

Which is correct?

A. 1 only
B. 1 and 2 only
C. 2 and 3 only
D. 1, 2 and 3

Correct Answer: B. 1 and 2 only

Explanation: Rajatarangini is a 12th-century Sanskrit chronicle, centuries later than Kanishka.

Question 3

Which of the following is correctly matched?

A. Epigraphy — Study of coins
B. Numismatics — Study of inscriptions
C. Epigraphy — Study of inscriptions
D. Archaeology — Study of only written records

Correct Answer: C. Epigraphy — Study of inscriptions

Question 4

Which script was written from right to left and had a strong association with the ancient north-west?

A. Brahmi
B. Kharoshthi
C. Sharada
D. Devanagari

Correct Answer: B. Kharoshthi

Question 5

Which of the following provides the strongest direct material evidence for the existence of an ancient settlement?

A. A later legend
B. Archaeological remains
C. A modern historical interpretation
D. A modern textbook

Correct Answer: B. Archaeological remains

Question 6

Which Chinese traveller is associated with an extended period of study in Kashmir during the 7th century CE?

A. O-kong
B. Xuanzang
C. Megasthenes
D. Al-Biruni

Correct Answer: B. Xuanzang

Question 7

Arrange the following broadly in chronological order:

1. Xuanzang’s visit to Kashmir
2. Kalhana’s Rajatarangini
3. O-kong’s visit to Kashmir

A. 1–3–2
B. 3–1–2
C. 2–1–3
D. 1–2–3

Correct Answer: A. 1–3–2

Explanation: Xuanzang belongs to the 7th century, O-kong to the 8th century, while Kalhana’s chronicle dates to the 12th century.

Question 8

Which source is particularly useful for understanding the sacred geography and religious-cultural traditions of Kashmir?

A. Nilamata Purana
B. Treaty of Amritsar
C. Ain-i-Akbari
D. Akbarnama

Correct Answer: A. Nilamata Purana

Question 9

A Kushan coin discovered in Kashmir most securely establishes which of the following?

A. The Kushan ruler personally visited the site
B. The site was certainly the Kushan capital
C. Kushan coinage circulated or was present at the site
D. Every inhabitant of the site was Kushan

Correct Answer: C. Kushan coinage circulated or was present at the site

Explanation: Coins are powerful evidence, but their presence does not automatically establish direct personal presence or complete political administration.

Question 10

Which approach is most appropriate for reconstructing ancient Kashmir?

A. Accept Rajatarangini literally in every detail
B. Ignore literary sources and rely only on archaeology
C. Use literary, archaeological, epigraphic, numismatic and travel evidence comparatively
D. Use only modern historical textbooks

Correct Answer: C

Explanation: Historical reconstruction is strongest when different forms of evidence are critically compared.

Part XXV — Rapid Revision Zone

Important Sources

Kalhana → Rajatarangini

Nilamata tradition → Sacred geography and religious culture

Xuanzang → 7th-century Kashmir

O-kong → 8th-century Kashmir

Archaeology → Material remains

Epigraphy → Inscriptions

Numismatics → Coins

Important Dates

Note: textual dating, especially for the Nilamata Purana, should be treated as approximate rather than mechanically precise.

Important Places

• Semthan → Early historic archaeology
• Harwan → Buddhist archaeology, terracotta tiles
• Ushkur → Hushkapura tradition
• Parihaspora → Karkota archaeological landscape
• Pandrethan → Ancient settlement and architectural history
• Baramulla/Jhelum basin → Major communication and archaeological landscape

Important Scripts

Important Disciplines

Archaeology → Material remains

Epigraphy → Inscriptions

Numismatics → Coins

Palaeography → Development and study of scripts

Manuscriptology → Study and preservation of manuscripts

One-Line Revision Facts

• Rajatarangini was written by Kalhana.
• It was composed in Sanskrit.
• It contains eight tarangas.
• It dates to the 12th century CE.
• It is a historical chronicle, not a modern archival history.
• Nilamata Purana is particularly valuable for Kashmir’s sacred geography and religious-cultural traditions.
• Archaeology provides material evidence.
• Epigraphy studies inscriptions.
• Numismatics studies coins.
• Kharoshthi was written right to left.
• Sharada became strongly associated with Kashmir in the later historical period.
• Xuanzang visited Kashmir in the 7th century.
• O-kong visited Kashmir in the 8th century.
• Semthan is important for Kashmir’s early historic archaeology.
• Harwan is important for Buddhist archaeology.
• Literary evidence and archaeological evidence should be corroborated, not conflated.

Part XXVI — Frequently Confused Facts

Is Rajatarangini an ancient-period text?

No. It is a 12th-century chronicle that describes earlier history as well as Kalhana’s own period.

Is Kalhana a contemporary source for Ashoka?

No. Kalhana lived many centuries after Ashoka. His account is a later literary source for the Mauryan past.

Is Rajatarangini unreliable?

That is too simplistic. It is an extremely important source, but different portions require different levels of critical scrutiny.

Is Nilamata Purana a political chronicle?

No. It is particularly valuable for Kashmir’s sacred geography, religious practices and cultural traditions.

What is the difference between archaeology and epigraphy?

Archaeology studies material remains broadly; epigraphy specifically studies inscriptions.

What is the difference between epigraphy and numismatics?

Epigraphy → inscriptions.

Numismatics → coins.

Does a coin prove political control?

Not automatically. It demonstrates the presence or circulation of the coin and must be interpreted in context.

Does a later manuscript mean the text itself is later?

No. A manuscript may be a later copy of an older work.

Is Sharada the same as Kharoshthi?

No. They belong to different historical script traditions.

Are Xuanzang’s numerical estimates modern census figures?

No. They are observations or estimates recorded by a historical traveller and should be interpreted accordingly.

Part XXVII — What Can JKSSB Ask?

This article contains several high-value examination areas:

Source–Author Association

• Kalhana → Rajatarangini
• Xuanzang → 7th-century travel account
• O-kong → 8th-century account

Source–Subject Association

• Nilamata Purana → sacred geography/religious culture
• Rajatarangini → Kashmir’s dynastic and political narrative
• Archaeology → material remains
• Epigraphy → inscriptions
• Numismatics → coins

Chronology

Xuanzang → O-kong → Kalhana

Evidence Classification

Candidates may be asked to distinguish:

• contemporary evidence
• later literary tradition
• archaeological evidence
• historical interpretation.

Script Identification

• Brahmi
• Kharoshthi
• Sharada

Archaeological Identification

• Semthan
• Harwan
• Ushkur
• Parihaspora

Conceptual Questions

A particularly important question type is:

Which source can establish what?

This tests understanding rather than simple memorisation.

Chapter Summary

Ancient Kashmir’s history cannot be reconstructed from a single source. The region’s past emerges through the interaction of literary traditions, archaeology, inscriptions, coins, manuscripts and travel accounts. Each source type has a different evidentiary value and answers different historical questions.

Rajatarangini occupies a central position because Kalhana attempted to construct a long historical narrative of Kashmir and drew upon earlier traditions and sources. Yet its 12th-century date means that its accounts of much earlier periods cannot automatically be treated as contemporary evidence. Its greatest value is realised when its narratives are compared with archaeology, inscriptions, coins and other independent evidence.

Archaeology provides the material foundation for much of ancient Kashmir’s history. Sites such as Semthan, Harwan, Ushkur and Parihaspora demonstrate the physical existence of settlements, religious institutions and cultural connections that can be compared with literary descriptions. Inscriptions and coins provide more specific evidence concerning names, rulers, dates, religious patronage, political authority and economic circulation, although each has its own limitations.

Travel accounts add another dimension. Xuanzang’s 7th-century visit and O-kong’s 8th-century account provide external evidence for Buddhist learning and institutional life in Kashmir. Their testimony is particularly valuable because it demonstrates that Kashmir remained connected with the wider Buddhist intellectual world, while also reminding historians that travellers observed the region through their own religious and scholarly interests.

The central lesson is therefore methodological:

Ancient Kashmir is not reconstructed by choosing one “best” source. It is reconstructed by comparing different kinds of evidence and identifying where they converge, where they diverge and where uncertainty remains.

JKSSB Takeaway

Remember the core source chain:

KALHANA → RAJATARANGINI → 12th CENTURY → 8 TARANGAS

NILAMATA PURANA → SACRED GEOGRAPHY & RELIGIOUS CULTURE

ARCHAEOLOGY → MATERIAL REMAINS

EPIGRAPHY → INSCRIPTIONS

NUMISMATICS → COINS

XUANZANG → 7th CENTURY

O-KONG → 8th CENTURY

SEMTHAN → EARLY HISTORIC ARCHAEOLOGY

HARWAN → BUDDHIST ARCHAEOLOGY

USHKUR → HUSHKAPURA TRADITION

SHARADA → LATER KASHMIR-ASSOCIATED SCRIPT

And the most important conceptual rule:

A later literary tradition, an archaeological discovery and a contemporary inscription do not carry the same evidentiary weight.

Mind Map

                 ANCIENT KASHMIR
                       │
                       ↓
              HISTORICAL SOURCES
                       │
       ┌───────────────┼────────────────┐
       ↓               ↓                ↓
   LITERARY         MATERIAL         EXTERNAL
    SOURCES          SOURCES          ACCOUNTS
       │               │                │
       │               │                │
 Nilamata          Archaeology       Xuanzang
 Rajatarangini     Inscriptions      O-kong
 Buddhist texts   Coins
       │               │                │
       └───────────────┼────────────────┘
                       ↓
               SOURCE CRITICISM
                       │
        ┌──────────────┼──────────────┐
        ↓              ↓              ↓
   Date/Context      Purpose       Corroboration
        │              │              │
        └──────────────┼──────────────┘
                       ↓
             HISTORICAL RECONSTRUCTION
                       │
          ┌────────────┼────────────┐
          ↓            ↓            ↓
      Political     Religious     Economic
       History       History       History
          │            │            │
          └────────────┼────────────┘
                       ↓
             ARCHAEOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE
                       │
       Semthan — Harwan — Ushkur
                       │
                 Parihaspora
                       │
                       ↓
              JKSSB APPLICATION
                       │
       Source → Author → Period → Evidence

FAQs

1. Why is Rajatarangini important for Kashmir history?

It provides an extensive Sanskrit narrative of Kashmir’s rulers, political developments, places and historical traditions from legendary beginnings to Kalhana’s own period.

2. Who wrote Rajatarangini?

Kalhana, in the 12th century CE.

3. How many books or tarangas are in Rajatarangini?

It is divided into eight tarangas.

4. Is Rajatarangini the only source for ancient Kashmir?

No. Archaeology, inscriptions, coins, manuscripts, Buddhist literature and travel accounts are also important.

5. What is the importance of archaeology?

It provides physical evidence of settlements, buildings, religious institutions, technology and material culture.

6. What is epigraphy?

Epigraphy is the study of inscriptions.

7. What is numismatics?

Numismatics is the study of coins and coinage.

8. Which Chinese traveller is particularly important for 7th-century Kashmir?

Xuanzang (Huien Tsang)

9. Which source is especially useful for Kashmir’s sacred geography?

The Nilamata Purana.

10. What is the most important methodological lesson?

No single source should automatically be treated as completely authoritative. Historical reconstruction is strongest when literary, archaeological, epigraphic, numismatic and travel evidence are critically compared.

About The Author

Rohit Thapa

See author's posts