Quit Kashmir Movement 1946

The historical landscape of Jammu and Kashmir is a tapestry of complex socio-political shifts, but few events resonate with as much intensity in the modern competitive examination syllabus as the Quit Kashmir Movement of 1946. For aspirants preparing for the Jammu and Kashmir Services Selection Board (JKSSB) examinations, particularly for posts like Naib Tehsildar, Junior Assistant, and Sub-Inspector, the 1946 movement represents the critical bridge between the 19th-century feudal era and the 20th-century democratic transition. 

This movement was not merely an isolated protest but a fundamental challenge to the legitimacy of the Dogra monarchy, catalyzed by the All Jammu and Kashmir National Conference under the leadership of Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah. Understanding the movement requires a deep dive into its root causes, specifically the Treaty of Amritsar, the socio-economic grievances of the Kashmiri population, and the shifting geopolitical dynamics during the waning years of the British Raj.   

The Centenary of a Sale Deed: The Treaty of Amritsar (1846)

The foundational grievance of the Quit Kashmir Movement traces back exactly one hundred years before its inception. On March 16, 1846, the Treaty of Amritsar was signed between the British East India Company and Gulab Singh of Jammu. This treaty followed the First Anglo-Sikh War and the subsequent Treaty of Lahore. In a transaction that Kashmiri leaders would later characterize as a “Sale Deed,” the British transferred the sovereignty of Kashmir to Gulab Singh for a sum of 75 lakh Nanakshahi rupees. This act effectively sold a land and its people to a single ruler, an event that became a permanent scar on the Kashmiri collective psyche.   

The legal and moral implications of this treaty provided the primary ideological fuel for the 1946 agitation. Sheikh Abdullah and his colleagues argued that a treaty signed a century ago could not condemn more than four million men and women to perpetual servitude under an absolute autocrat. The National Conference’s memorandum to the Cabinet Mission in 1946 explicitly demanded the repudiation of this treaty, asserting that sovereignty should naturally transfer to the people rather than remain a hereditary right of the Dogra house. For JKSSB aspirants, the following table summarizes the key financial and political metrics of the 1846 transaction which are frequently tested in previous year questions.   

Socio-Economic Causes: A Century of Discontent

The economic landscape of Jammu and Kashmir during the century of Dogra rule was marked by centralized control and systemic exploitation. To recover the 75 lakhs paid for the territory, the administration imposed a rigorous taxation system that touched every facet of life. This economic pressure was felt most acutely by the Kashmiri Muslim majority, who were largely agrarian or worked in handicraft guilds like the shawl weavers.   

The Burden of Taxation and the Begar System

The Dogra administration’s fiscal policies were characterized by a total lack of transparency and a focus on maximizing revenue for the state treasury. Taxes were levied not just on land and crops, but on domestic animals, hearths, and even windows. In the Kashmir Valley, the state claimed ownership of all land, reducing the peasantry to tenants-at-will who could be evicted at any time.   

Furthermore, the practice of “Begar” or forced labor remained a persistent grievance. Villagers were frequently rounded up by state officials to carry heavy loads to the frontier regions of Gilgit and Leh for minimal or no pay. This system not only disrupted the agrarian cycle but also led to significant mortality among the laborers due to the treacherous terrain and harsh weather conditions. The 1877–1879 famine, which decimated nearly 60 percent of the valley’s population, further highlighted the inability of the autocratic regime to provide social safety nets, sowing the seeds of deep-seated resentment that would blossom into political mobilization in the 20th century.   

The Labor Crisis in Srinagar

By the mid-1940s, industrial grievances also began to surface. The silk mill in Srinagar, owned by the Maharaja, became a flashpoint for labor unrest. Workers there were shabbily treated, underpaid, and subjected to grueling working conditions. Most of these laborers were Kashmiri Muslims, and their mistreatment became a focal point for the early political organizers of the Muslim Conference and later the National Conference. This specific grievance bridged the gap between rural agrarian misery and urban industrial dissatisfaction, creating a united front against the monarchy.   

Political Mobilization: From 1931 to the Naya Kashmir Vision

The modern political struggle in Jammu and Kashmir is often traced back to July 13, 1931, an event triggered by the trial of Abdul Qadeer and the subsequent firing on protesters at the Srinagar Central Jail. This massacre, which resulted in 22 deaths, catalyzed the formation of the All Jammu and Kashmir Muslim Conference in 1932. Led by Sheikh Mohammad Abdullah and Chaudhry Ghulam Abbas, the party initially sought representational rights for the Muslim majority in government services and education.   

The Transition to Secular Nationalism

By the late 1930s, Sheikh Abdullah realized that a religious framework was insufficient for a broader struggle against autocracy. Influenced by the secular ideals of the Indian National Congress and leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru, he moved to open the party to all communities. In June 1939, the Muslim Conference was formally converted into the All Jammu and Kashmir National Conference (NC). This shift was pivotal for the Quit Kashmir Movement, as it framed the struggle not as a religious conflict but as a secular battle between “the people” and an “irresponsible ruler”.   

The Naya Kashmir Manifesto (1944)

The ideological maturity of the National Conference culminated in the adoption of the ‘Naya Kashmir’ (New Kashmir) manifesto in 1944. This document, heavily influenced by socialist principles and the Soviet Constitution of 1936, proposed a blueprint for a democratic state. It envisioned:   

1. The abolition of the princely order and feudalism.
2. Universal adult franchise and a representative National Assembly.
3. Sweeping land reforms based on the principle of “land to the tiller.”
4. Social security, equal rights for women, and state-led economic planning.   

This manifesto served notice to the Maharaja that the people were no longer seeking mere reforms but were demanding a complete structural overhaul of the state’s political and economic foundations.   

The Immediate Triggers of the 1946 Agitation

As World War II concluded, the British government dispatched the Cabinet Mission to India in 1946 to negotiate the terms of the transfer of power. The mission’s arrival in Srinagar in April 1946 became the immediate catalyst for the Quit Kashmir Movement.   

The Cabinet Mission and the “Princely Question”

The Cabinet Mission, consisting of Lord Pethick-Lawrence, Sir Stafford Cripps, and A.V. Alexander, held a position that once British paramountcy lapsed, the princely states would technically become independent, and the decision to join either India or Pakistan would rest with the rulers. Sheikh Abdullah and the National Conference vehemently opposed this, arguing that “paramountcy” should transfer to the people, not the monarchs who were viewed as “stooges of British imperialism”.   

The NC submitted a memorandum to the mission asserting that the Treaty of Amritsar was a “sale deed” that had expired after a century. When the mission showed a preference for negotiating with the rulers rather than popular organizations, the National Conference felt betrayed and decided that a direct challenge to the monarchy was the only remaining option.   

The Crisis of the “Diarchy” and Mirza Afzal Beg’s Resignation

Internally, the political situation was deteriorating. Maharaja Hari Singh, under British pressure, had introduced a limited form of democracy called “diarchy,” where some ministers were elected representatives of the assembly (Praja Sabha). Mirza Afzal Beg was the NC’s representative in the cabinet, but he soon found himself marginalized and his decisions vetoed by the Prime Minister, Ram Chandra Kak. Beg’s resignation in early 1946 and the Maharaja’s attempt to replace him with a more compliant figure, Mian Ahmad Yar, were viewed as “Machiavellian” attempts to disrupt the National Conference. These events signaled that the monarchy was unwilling to share real power, making a mass movement inevitable.   

The Timeline of the Quit Kashmir Movement: May 1946

The movement officially began on May 10, 1946, when Sheikh Abdullah delivered a historic speech in Srinagar, directly calling for the Dogra dynasty to “Quit Kashmir”. This slogan was a conscious adaptation of the Indian National Congress’s “Quit India” call of 1942, signaling a unified anti-imperialist front across the subcontinent.   

Key Events of May 1946

The following table provides a chronological breakdown of the movement’s launch, which is high-yield material for JKSSB exam preparation.   

The rhetoric of the movement was centered on the total abolition of the princely order. Abdullah challenged the world to recognize that no “sale deed” could condemn a people to servitude when the “will to live under this rule” was no longer there. Slogans like “Bainama Amritsar tod du—Kashmir chhod du” (Tear down the Sale Deed—Quit Kashmir) became the rallying cry for the masses.   

The State Response: Martial Law and Repression

Prime Minister Ram Chandra Kak was determined to suppress the agitation with an iron fist. Following the arrest of Sheikh Abdullah on May 20, the state was placed under what many contemporary observers described as a “reign of terror”.   

The army was deployed in Srinagar and major provincial towns. Curfews were enforced strictly, and public gatherings were met with bayonets and bullets. The repression included:

1. Mass Incarcerations: Almost the entire top leadership of the National Conference, including Maulana Masoodi and Mirza Afzal Beg, were imprisoned.   
2. Collective Fines and Firings: Police firings led to several deaths, and collective fines were imposed on neighborhoods known for supporting the NC.   
3. Communication Blackout: The state press was heavily censored, and communication with the rest of India was restricted to prevent the spread of the agitation.   

Internationalization: Nehru’s Arrest at Kohala

The Quit Kashmir Movement quickly became more than a local affair. Jawaharlal Nehru, who shared a deep ideological bond with Abdullah, expressed his outrage at the state’s tactics. In June 1946, Nehru decided to personally enter Kashmir to assist in Abdullah’s legal defense.   

On June 19, 1946, Nehru reached the Kohala border crossing. Despite being served an order by the Maharaja’s administration banning his entry, Nehru attempted to cross the bridge. He was arrested by state police and detained in a dak bungalow at Domel. This arrest sent shockwaves throughout India, forcing the Congress leadership, including Mahatma Gandhi and Maulana Azad, to intervene. While Nehru was eventually persuaded to return to Delhi for constitutional negotiations, his arrest solidified the National Conference’s alliance with the Indian National Congress and internationalized the Kashmiri struggle for freedom.   

The Sedition Trial: “Kashmir on Trial”

Sheikh Abdullah’s trial for sedition was held at the Badami Bagh cantonment in Srinagar. This trial became a platform for Abdullah to articulate the philosophical and legal basis of the movement to the world. Prominent lawyers like Asaf Ali and Dewan Chaman Lal traveled to Srinagar to defend him.   

Abdullah’s statement in court was a powerful indictment of the monarchy. He argued that it was not a crime to demand that a government be based on the “will of the people” rather than a century-old treaty which was “impugnable in the highest International Court of Justice”. He famously stated that the “trial of an individual” was, in fact, the “trial of a whole people”. Despite the robust defense, Abdullah was sentenced to nine years of imprisonment, a conviction that only enhanced his status as a martyr for the Kashmiri cause.   

Impact and Legacy of the Quit Kashmir Movement

The immediate impact of the 1946 agitation was a total breakdown in relations between the monarchy and the popular leadership. However, the long-term consequences fundamentally reshaped the state’s destiny as it moved toward 1947.

Transition from Monarchy to Democracy

The movement shattered the political legitimacy of Maharaja Hari Singh. Although the agitation was suppressed by force, the state was administratively weakened. When the tribal invasion from Pakistan occurred in October 1947, the Maharaja was forced to release Sheikh Abdullah from prison on September 29, 1947, and appoint him as the Emergency Administrator. The “Quit Kashmir” demand had succeeded in ensuring that the final decision on the state’s future would involve the popular leadership rather than being a sole prerogative of the ruler.   

Land to the Tiller: Socio-Economic Revolution

The most significant legacy of the movement was the implementation of the radical land reforms envisioned in the Naya Kashmir manifesto. After the state’s accession to India, the NC government under Abdullah enacted the Abolition of Big Landed Estates Act in 1950. This legislation transferred land from feudal landlords to the actual tillers without any compensation, fulfilling the anti-feudal promises made during the 1946 struggle. This move broke the back of the centuries-old exploitative agrarian system in the region.   

The Special Status and Article 370

The arguments for “people’s sovereignty” made during the Quit Kashmir Movement provided the constitutional basis for Jammu and Kashmir’s special status within the Indian Union. The leaders of the movement negotiated Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, arguing that because the people had fought for their freedom from both British imperialism and Dogra autocracy, they were entitled to a unique constitutional arrangement.   

JKSSB Exam Orientation: High-Yield Revision and PYQs

For aspirants, the 1946 movement is a goldmine of potential questions. Recent JKSSB notifications, including those for 2025 and 2026, place significant weight on the “Freedom Struggle/Movement” in Jammu and Kashmir.   

Key Names and Places to Remember

1. Sheikh-ul-Alam Airport: Named after the patron saint of Kashmir, often asked in the same section as Sheikh Abdullah’s history.   
2. Badami Bagh Cantonment: The site of Sheikh Abdullah’s sedition trial in 1946.   
3. Kohala and Domel: The border locations where Jawaharlal Nehru was arrested by the Maharaja’s police.   
4. Amira Kadal: The site of early clashes between NC workers and state supporters in May 1946.   
5. Praja Sabha: The legislative assembly where the NC’s struggle for “Responsible Government” was initially fought.   

Practice MCQs based on Recent Trends

• Question: In which year was the All Jammu and Kashmir Muslim Conference renamed the National Conference?
  • Answer: 1939 (specifically June 11, 1939).   
• Question: Who was the Prime Minister of J&K during the Quit Kashmir Movement?
  • Answer: Pandit Ram Chandra Kak.   
• Question: Which treaty was called the “Sale Deed of Kashmir” by the National Conference?
  • Answer: Treaty of Amritsar (1846).   
• Question: Where was Sheikh Abdullah arrested in May 1946?
  • Answer: Garhi.   

Current Affairs and Recent Developments (2025–2026)

Connecting history to the present is a hallmark of JKSSB general awareness sections. Aspirants should be aware of the modern administrative framework that evolved from these historical struggles.

The J&K Reorganization Act and Assembly Elections

The year 2025 saw a major milestone with the holding of assembly elections and the presentation of the first budget in the J&K Assembly after a seven-year hiatus in March 2025. Omar Abdullah, the grandson of Sheikh Abdullah, was elected as the Chief Minister in early 2025, bringing the political lineage of the “Quit Kashmir” leader back into the executive spotlight.   

Furthermore, the J&K Reorganization Amendment Bill 2025 introduced new provisions regarding the powers of the Lieutenant Governor and the removal of the Chief Minister under specific detention criteria. These contemporary legal developments are often framed as the next stage in the long evolution of the state’s political status that began with the demand for “absolute freedom” in 1946.   

Significant Milestones in 2025-26

Aspirants should note these specific current affairs data points for the 2026 exam cycle.   

Analyzing the Movement’s Philosophy: Aspirant Insights

The Quit Kashmir Movement was not just a protest against a person; it was a protest against a system of “irresponsible rule”. For a JKSSB aspirant, it is important to understand the why as much as the what.   

The movement succeeded because it transformed a sectarian struggle into a nationalistic one. By the centenary of the Treaty of Amritsar, the National Conference had successfully messaged that the Dogra rule was a form of “Double Imperialism”—where the people were vassals to a Maharaja who was, in turn, a vassal to the British. This framing allowed the Kashmiri struggle to align with the global tide of decolonization and the Indian national movement.   

The Role of Media and Archives

Research and archival documents from the Department of Archives, Archaeology, and Museums J&K show that the movement was also a “mass rebellion” that involved spontaneous revolts in rural districts. While official police reports of the time might downplay the agitation as “local demagoguery,” the records held in the National Archives of India indicate that the movement was pervasive enough to cause significant alarm within the British Foreign and Political Department. This discrepancy between state narratives and archival reality is a common theme in JKSSB history questions, which often ask about the role of primary sources like the Baharistan-i-Shahi or Kalhana’s Rajatarangini for ancient history, and newspaper accounts for modern history.   

Conclusion: The Road Ahead for Aspirants

The Quit Kashmir Movement remains the most intensive mass mobilization in the history of Jammu and Kashmir before 1947. Its study offers aspirants a comprehensive look at the intersection of law, economics, and political bravery. From the exorbitant 75 lakh rupee sale deed to the radical land reforms of 1950, the movement represents a century-long arc of a people reclaiming their sovereignty.   

About The Author

Sahil Digra

See author's posts